Here’s a comparative analysis to help investors understand the differences between these two strategies.
Regulatory framework: Long-short AIFs vs absolute return funds
Long-short AIFs
Long-short AIFs are governed by the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, under Category III AIFs.
These funds are less regulated compared to mutual funds, offering greater flexibility in terms of investment strategies.
Category III AIFs can take more aggressive positions, including leveraging, short selling, and using derivatives, making them more suited for sophisticated investors.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return funds can be structured either as mutual funds or AIFs but are commonly available as mutual funds for retail investors.
They are regulated by SEBI’s mutual fund guidelines, which provide greater transparency and oversight.
Absolute return mutual funds are bound by more stringent rules on disclosure and risk management.
Investor accessibility: Who can invest?
Long-short AIFs
These funds are designed primarily for high-net-worth individuals (HNIs) and institutional investors, with a minimum investment of ₹1 crore.
The higher entry point makes long-short AIFs suitable for those with a substantial capital base and a high-risk appetite.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return mutual funds, on the other hand, are open to retail investors, with a relatively low minimum investment requirement (starting from ₹500).
This accessibility makes them attractive for small investors seeking to diversify their portfolios with low-correlation assets.
Investment strategy: Flexibility and risk
Long-short AIFs
Long-short AIFs focus on taking long positions in assets expected to appreciate and short positions in those expected to decline.
These funds employ a wide range of complex investment strategies, including derivatives and leverage, to maximise returns. The high flexibility allows managers to adapt to market conditions, but this also introduces a higher level of risk.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return funds employ a variety of strategies such as long-short equity, arbitrage, and derivatives, similar to AIFs. However, the scope of strategies is typically more conservative.
The primary goal of these funds is to deliver positive returns over time while preserving capital, making them less aggressive than long-short AIFs.
Liquidity: How easily can you exit?
Long-short AIFs
Due to their structure, long-short AIFs generally have lower liquidity. Most AIFs have a lock-in period ranging from 1 to 3 years, which means investors cannot redeem their investments until the period ends.
This makes them more suitable for investors who can afford to commit their capital for the long term.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return mutual funds offer higher liquidity, allowing investors to redeem their units at any time. Since mutual funds are open-ended, they provide flexibility in terms of access to funds, making them more attractive to retail investors looking for liquidity and ease of exit.
Transparency: Understanding fund holdings and performance
Long-short AIFs
AIFs, particularly Category III, tend to be less transparent than mutual funds.
While they must disclose their financials periodically, they do not have the same level of real-time transparency as mutual funds.
Investors typically receive quarterly or semi-annual reports, which means detailed tracking of individual securities and strategies is not always possible.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return mutual funds provide higher transparency with regular updates on portfolio holdings and performance. Investors can track their investments more easily, as mutual funds are required to disclose portfolio information regularly.
This makes absolute return funds a more transparent option for investors seeking detailed insights.
Risk and return potential: Which is riskier?
Long-short AIFs
Long-short AIFs carry higher risk due to their flexible use of leverage and complex investment strategies.
While they have the potential for higher returns, especially in volatile markets, they also expose investors to greater downside risk.
These funds are suited for investors who can handle market fluctuations and have a long-term horizon.
Absolute return funds
Absolute return funds are generally considered lower risk than long-short AIFs. While they may not offer the same high potential for returns, they are designed to provide steady, positive returns over time, with an emphasis on capital preservation.
The conservative approach to strategy and risk management makes them suitable for more risk-averse investors.
Conclusion: Which is right for you?
Both long-short AIFs and absolute return funds offer compelling investment strategies, but the right choice depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and capital availability.
Long-short AIFs are best suited for sophisticated investors with a higher risk tolerance and the ability to lock in capital for the long term. They offer flexibility and the potential for higher returns, but at the cost of increased risk and limited liquidity.
Absolute return funds are ideal for retail investors looking for consistent, positive returns with higher liquidity and more transparency.
Before investing, it’s essential to assess your financial goals, risk profile, and investment horizon.
ALSO READ | Long-short AIFs explained: How they work and who should invest
